Categories
Bioregionalism Events Learning Experiences News

Upper New r3.0 Confluence 2026

Announcing the Upper New Confluence

Here at the Upper New, we are pleased to announce that we will be hosting a local bioregional “confluence” in parallel with the global r3.0 Conference happening in September 2026.  While the r3.0 Conference will be held remotely, with daily sessions available as video conferences or webinars, our local Upper New confluence will be a small gathering of people interested in bioregional learning, planning, and building in the Upper New bioregion.  In fact, most of the participants in the conference will be gathered in similar small groups in bioregions all over the world.

Where’s the Upper New bioregion?  It’s in northwestern North Carolina and southwestern Virginia, stretching from Blowing Rock to Blacksburg.  You can find us on the map below.  We encourage you to locate yourself on the map.

If the embedded map is difficult to use, here’s a link to the map.

Quick side note: The featured image for this post, showing a small rock in the bend of a river reflecting clouds, is actually the New River, where it crosses the state line between North Carolina and Virginia.  The photograph was captured by Benjamin Erlandson, and is used with his permission.

About the Conference

Taking place from September 8-10, the theme of the 2026 r3.0 Conference is “Bioregional Regeneration as Collapse Resilience: Earth-centric Biocultural Kinship, Knowledge & Governance”.  As noted on the conference website: 

“The r3.0 Conference kicks off Global Bioregional Month in September 2026 by gathering the bioregionally committed and the bioregional curious for three days online together. Each day will be anchored by a two-hour interactive panel, on the 3 central themes of Relational Kinship, Knowledge Commons, and Self-Governance.  These will be bookended by cross-bioregional Reflection Sessions at diverse timings to bridge global time zones.   And most of the audience will attend via in-person Confluences organized by bioregional groups globally – last year, more than 50 bioregional groups registered to host Confluences across 6 continents, and we expect even more this year!”

2026 r3.0 Conference

2026 Conference Structure

Each day of the conference is centered around  a single interactive panel session, with each day focused on a particular theme.

Day One: Relational Kinship

Day Two: Knowledge Commons

Day Three: Self-Governance

More detail is available about these themes and sessions on the Conference agenda.

Each day of the conference, time will be allotted for local Confluence groups to engage with the recordings of the panel sessions, and to share reflections about the Conference themes, to discuss developments in our own bioregional contexts, and to foster any other discussions unfolding as a result.

Confluence participants will have ample time to engage internally on each day of the r3.0 conference.  Due to time zone differences around the world, the r3.0 conference tech team will ensure that panel recordings are available within two hours after panel conclusion, allowing for those of us that cannot “watch live” to catch up on the contents before our reflection sessions.

Photograph of the gravel bottom of the Little River at its confluence with the New River.
This is a photograph of the Little River at its confluence with the New River in Virginia. Photograph copyright Benjamin Erlandson, used with permission.

Upper New Confluence Format

As the Upper New is, organizationally speaking, relatively new on the bioregional scene, we have elected to hold a “Living Room” Confluence, which is a smaller self-hosted gathering of approximately 5-10 people.  These smaller events are typically geared toward folks who are early along on the pathway to bioregionalism: curious and ready to find out more by engaging with others of similar interest.

Conference Agenda + Schedule

Over the three days of the conference agenda, the schedule follows a stable pattern.  Each day, these sessions will occur as follows on eastern time (converted)

  • 9:30AM: Introduction Session (online via r3.0)
  • 10:00AM – 12:00PM: Conference Panel Session (online via r3.0)
  • 4:00PM – 5:30PM: Confluence Reflection Session (in-person/hybrid via Upper New)

Tuesday, September 8th

  • Conference Introduction: Bioregional Regeneration as Collapse Resilience
  • Conference Panel Session One: Relational Kinship
  • Confluence Reflection Session

Wednesday, September 9th

  • Day Two Introduction: Global Bioregional Month
  • Conference Panel Session Two: Bioregional Knowledge Commons
  • Confluence Reflection Session

Thursday, September 10th

  • Conference Panel Session Three: Bioregional Self-Governance
  • Confluence Reflection Session

On Wednesday and Thursday, there are optional additional reflection sessions at 6:00AM.  For the Upper New Confluence, these will be considered opportunities for additional individual solitary reflection time over breakfast, etc.

Confluence Conference Registration

Confirmed participants in the Upper New Confluence will receive access to a customized r3.0 Conference Registration link that allows them to register and attend r3.0 free of charge.  If you are a budding bioregionalist in the Upper New bioregion and wish to participate, please contact us to indicate your interest and we’ll be in touch ASAP!

If you know someone in the Upper New bioregion who would be interested in attending this confluence, please do not hesitate to share this post with them and encourage them to sign up for a slot to attend!

Beyond r3.0 – Turtle Island Bioregional Congress

In addition to participating as a confluence host organization, the Upper New will be following up this bioregional experience with another.  Upper New Founder Benjamin Erlandson will be attending the 11th Turtle Island Bioregional Congress (TIBC11) from September 15th – 19th.  For the first time in 17 years, a Continental-scale Bioregional Congress for all of North America (Turtle Island) will be hosted in-person in Vernonia, Oregon, in the heart of the Cascadia Bioregion.

As a delegate, we will be networking with bioregionalists across the continent of North America, sharing notes and best practices, and building momentum for each other.  It’s possible that Dr. Erlandson will be presenting some of the frameworks we’re putting in place here in the Upper New as well.

Categories
Challenges Learning Experiences News

Building The Darkway, Part One

Protecting the Night, Empowering Our Communities: Announcing “Building the Darkway, Part I”

Photograph of the Blue Ridge Parkway captured during reconstruction and resurfacing.  Our visual introduction for Building The Darkway.
The Blue Ridge Parkway at Air Bellows Gap during reconstruction and resurfacing.

The Blue Ridge Parkway is globally celebrated for its breathtaking daytime vistas, drawing millions of visitors to our winding mountain roads every year. But half of the Parkway’s story happens after sunset.

As part of our ongoing engagement with the Blue Ridge Parkway Foundation’s Blue Ridge Rising program, we are thrilled to announce the official release of our new position paper: Building the Darkway, Part I: Dark Skies & Tourism Along the Blue Ridge Parkway.

Access the Full Position Paper (PDF) Here

Why Building The Darkway Matters for Our Gateway Communities

This isn’t just a technical manual for stargazers or a rigid set of environmental demands. Building the Darkway is a visionary, high-level blueprint designed specifically for the municipalities, local businesses, and residents who form the backbone of the Parkway corridor.

As tourism evolves, “astrotourism” (travel driven by the desire to see natural, light-pollution-free night skies) is booming. Our region sits on a perceived “goldmine” of natural darkness, but as urban sprawl expands, this valuable economic and ecological asset is slipping away.
This paper draws a line in the sand—or rather, a stake in the mountain soil. It explores how we can balance economic growth with common-sense nocturnal conservation. By implementing smart, targeted, and warm-colored outdoor lighting, our communities can:

  • Boost local economies by attracting high-value, low-impact overnight tourists.
  • Protect native Appalachian wildlife, from our famous “Blue Ghost” fireflies to migratory birds and salamanders.
  • Save money and energy by eliminating wasted, poorly aimed light that shines directly into the sky.
Detail of center line on Blue Ridge Parkway pavement

A Call to Action for Virginia and North Carolina Leaders

If you live, work, or serve in government within the Parkway’s gateway counties, this paper was written for you. True paradigm shifts happen from the ground up, and we need municipal leaders, county commissioners, chambers of commerce, and local advocates to help guide this practical transition.

We are explicitly looking to spark civil discourse, collaborative policy changes, and progressive stewardship frameworks in the following counties:

  • In Virginia: Augusta, Nelson, Rockbridge, Amherst, Botetourt, Bedford, Roanoke, Franklin, Floyd, Patrick, Carroll, and Grayson Counties.
  • In North Carolina: Surry, Alleghany, Ashe, Watauga, Wilkes, Caldwell, Avery, Burke, McDowell, Mitchell, Yancey, Buncombe, Henderson, Transylvania, Haywood, Jackson, and Swain Counties.

Whether you want to protect the rural heritage of Floyd County, manage high-recreation headwaters in Watauga County, or balance urban-adjacent growth in the Roanoke Region, this paper provides regional models pressure-tested for your specific community’s needs.

Access the PDF Version of Building the Darkway, Part I

Mapping The Darkway

As a complement to this position paper, we’ve built an interactive map: Building The Darkway.  It is important to be able to explore the area and highlight elements of the proceeding argument in a way that can be visualized for understanding.

In addition to mapping the adjacent counties as gateway communities, we have contextualized the counties (and the Blue Ridge Parkway) within all connected bioregions (USGS sub-basins) and Level III North American ecoregions.  Another element of this project that is of importance to us is that a substantial portion of the Blue Ridge Parkway serves as a “boundary” of the Upper New River bioregion, along the Blue Ridge Escarpment and Eastern Continental Divide.  As such, we find anything associated with the Blue Ridge Parkway to be of keen interest.

Open Access: Understanding Our Creative Commons License

We want this document to be used as a tool for public education, community town halls, and local policy debates. To ensure it is shared widely while maintaining the integrity of the work, we are releasing the paper under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) License.

Here is what that means in plain English for you, your organization, or your local government:

  • Attribution (BY): You are free to download, share, and distribute this paper, but you must give appropriate credit to the authors and link back to our original work.
  • NonCommercial (NC): You cannot use this paper, or any part of it, for commercial marketing purposes or sell it for profit.
  • NoDerivatives (ND): If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material publicly. We want the integrity of this collective regional framework to remain intact.

We encourage you to download the PDF, email it to your local representatives, share it with your neighborhood associations, and bring its concepts to your next planning board meeting.

Let’s work together to ensure the Blue Ridge region thrives by day—and stays beautifully, economically, and ecologically dark by night.

Sunset view from the Blue Ridge Parkway near Balsam, NC.

The Executive Summary of the position paper is included below for a detailed overview of each section’s findings and recommendations.

Executive Summary

Dark Skies and Responsible Outdoor Lighting

This position document introduces DarkSky International as the primary global authority combating light pollution and outlines its International Dark Sky Places (IDSP) certification programs. For the Blue Ridge Parkway and its adjacent regions, the most applicable tracks are International Dark Sky Parks (for public conservation lands) and International Dark Sky Communities (for adjacent towns enacting protective local lighting ordinances). To guide these local transitions, the document highlights the Five Principles for Responsible Outdoor Lighting, which require all outdoor light to be useful, targeted downwards, low-level, controlled with timers or motion sensors, and warm-colored to minimize atmospheric scattering and blue-light disruption.

The Blue Ridge Rising Project and Action Plan

The Blue Ridge Rising initiative is a regional project hosted by the Blue Ridge Parkway Foundation to unite 29 gateway communities and counties across Virginia and North Carolina. Backed by a $5.1 million Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) grant and over $4.2 million in matching funds, the project implements a shared Action Plan built upon six elements: Marketing, Visitor Experience, Advocacy, Resource Protection, Education, and Capacity. Within this regional framework, Blue Ridge Rising aims to protect dark skies by measuring sky quality, replacing non-compliant lighting fixtures on public lands, and supporting gateway communities in achieving official Dark Sky certification.

Mapping The Darkway and Wildlife Migration

The document introduces an interactive map (“Building The Darkway”) that integrates adjacent gateway counties within their broader connected ecoregions and bioregions, such as the Upper New River sub-basin. This geographical framework directly connects to The Nature Conservancy’s “Migrations in Motion” project, which models how species must travel northward and upward to survive changing global climates. The continuous, public land of the Appalachian Corridor serves as a continent-scale “climate superhighway” and a core refuge within the broader Eastern Wildway. Keeping this corridor wild and dark is essential to prevent urban sprawl from blocking the natural migrations of mammals, birds, and amphibians.

Perceiving and Navigating Roads: Relevant Ecologies

To understand animal movement, the document bridges road ecology (the environmental impacts of transportation networks) with sensory ecology (how animals perceive their surroundings). Every species occupies a unique biological sensory bubble known as an Umwelt and navigates its environment by interpreting natural communication signals—a field of study known as biosemiotics. When migratory species encounter the Blue Ridge Parkway, their sensory worlds face severe disruption from “sensory pollution”. This includes acoustic shuttering from engine noise, flat asphalt surfaces that trick insects into laying eggs on roads, and blinding high-beam headlights that temporarily wipe out nocturnal vision.

Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting (ALAN)

The document establishes critical distinctions between Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) and superfluous, wasted light. Light pollution acts as a pervasive ecological stressor that combines with habitat loss and climate change to create a destructive “combinatorial crucible” for wildlife. Applying the economic theory of the Jevons Paradox, the document demonstrates how increasing lighting efficiency historically rebounds into an exponential increase in total light pollution rather than energy savings. Using a “panarchy” systems framework, the document maps these compounding threats across terrestrial food webs (insect population declines), marine-land interfaces, and aerial migration corridors.

Regional Biospherical Impacts and Specific Appalachian Threats

On a regional scale, ALAN causes widespread biospherical damage, resulting in plant lifecycle disruptions (phenological shifts), pollination failures, wildlife disorientation, and altered predator-prey dynamics. The document identifies severe ecological threats to species unique to the Southern Appalachian and Upper New River bioregions. Species highly dependent on absolute natural darkness—such as the rare “Blue Ghost” firefly, native Appalachian salamanders, and aquatic hellbenders—face population instability due to encroaching human light domes.

Darkness: Ecological Crisis and Human Impact

The document frames the loss of natural darkness as a “Tragedy of the Commons,” where a shared public resource is degraded by unmanaged human intrusion. This crisis is driven by anthropocentrism—the culturally biased belief that human convenience exempts society from ecological limits. The paper chronicles how human nocturnal activities colonize the night, causing intrusive disruptions across twelve distinct sensory channels and fundamentally reorganizing vulnerable ecosystems.

Systems Literacy, Leverage Points, and Ecosemiotics

To reverse these trends, the document applies systems theory and Donella Meadows’ framework of “leverage points” to design effective conservation interventions. These range from shallow adjustments (modifying local lighting parameters and codes) to mid-level changes (improving informational flows) and deep paradigm shifts (reorganizing how human societies value darkness). By utilizing ecosemiotics—the tracking of ecosystem transitions through biological indicators—and integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), communities can shift their mental models from viewing darkness as a commercial resource to viewing it as a shared kinship.

Commodification vs. Community Stewardship

The document offers an ecocentric critique of commercializing darkness strictly as a tourist commodity. Promoting unregulated “dark sky tourism” risks introducing destructive consumer behaviors into fragile mountain habitats. Instead, the document advocates for decommodifying the night sky through grassroots, sector-by-sector community stewardship. This includes instituting a strict “visitor contract” to govern tourist behavior, weaving nocturnal conservation into public education, and shifting local tourism economies from consumption to active biosphere protection.

Bioregional Stewardship Framework and Policy Models

A multi-scalar Bioregional Stewardship Framework is proposed for the Blue Ridge corridor, utilizing a “tri-lens implementation strategy” to establish a protective regional “stewardship overlay”. This model is pressure-tested across distinct pilot zones categorized by human impact tiers: Tier 1 Urban-Adjacent Hubs (Roanoke Region, VA), Tier 2 High-Recreation Headwaters (Watauga County, NC; Augusta County, VA; Swain County, NC), and Tier 3 Rural Agrarian Buffers (Floyd County, VA; Alleghany County, NC). To fund this transition, the document outlines concrete policy mechanisms, including green taxes, visitor user fees, redirected marketing budgets via “Chambers of Stewardship,” and a structured degrowth tracking system to actively engineer the reduction of regional light footprints.

Practical Synthesis: Getting to Darkness

The final section provides an operational case study focused on managing dark skies tourism within the Elkin-to-Doughton section of the Parkway. It outlines the logistical and financial realities of dark-sky event planning, covering environmental impact calculations, ambient traffic management protocols, and using urban light domes as educational tools. The paper presents a comprehensive rollout budget for a zero-emission Blue Ridge Parkway Electric Shuttle Experience Tour, addressing technical infrastructure hurdles like mobile vs. stationary EV charging, ticket pricing equity, and the expansion of regenerative camping educational programs. Ultimately, the paper provides prioritized recommendations for the Blue Ridge Rising action plan.

Categories
Calls For Submissions News

Helene, The Aftermath: Recovering Relationships with Rivers

We’re seeking narratives about Hurricane Helene and the resulting floods and landslides, etc. that occurred across the Appalachian region: fiction and nonfiction, geolocated photo essays, documentary and fiction films as well.

Photograph of New River flooding under US 21 bridge
Sept 27, 2024: The New River flooding under the US 21 bridge on the border of North Carolina and Virginia.

Full details of the submission prompt are below.

Feel free to skip straight to the submission portal.

Categories
Learning Experiences News Volunteering

Join Us For Friday!

Join us for Friday Afternoon in the Universe, an open discourse multigenerational learning community hosted by The Upper New. This post is a quick introduction to the many ways any person can participate in the global Friday community.

Friday Topics Schedule

We have put together a master Google Calendar for Friday Afternoon In The Universe, listing the meeting times and locations for our Sparta-based discussion series. Eventually this calendar will include globally relevant “pre-Friday” deadlines for document submissions, etc.

Ways to Participate

There are six easy ways to participate in any Friday discussion group.

  1. Listserv
  2. Local Discussion Group (Sparta or elsewhere)
  3. Facilitator
  4. Notetaker
  5. Listserv Moderator
  6. Discussion Host (Where You Are)

Keep scrolling for basic information about how to participate in each of these ways.  You can also read more in-depth information about Friday Afternoon In The Universe.

Listserv

Everyone who participates in our Friday discussions anywhere in the world will be a member of the listserv, as this is the primary mode of communication for the Friday community.

It is perfectly acceptable for people in the Friday community to participate only through the listserv, engaging in online conversations at any pace, and thus having access to all the resources generated around each topic, made available through the shared Google Drive.

You can visit the listserv on Google Groups and ask to join.  You’ll fill out a quick form and then we’ll be notified, and an admin will approve your request.

Friday: Local Discussion Group

Whether you’re within reasonable travel distance of Sparta or elsewhere, you can participate in any in-person discussion wherever they are happening in the world.  It’s preferred if you would register in advance at your Friday location of choice, but, as the old saying goes, walk-ins are welcome too.

All the libraries in the Upper New bioregion.

We’re hoping that we can have a satellite Friday session at every library in the Upper New Bioregion, as well as every library in our nine neighboring bioregions.

All the libraries across the Upper New and our nine neighboring bioregions.

Here’s a table showing the counts of all library branches in each bioregion.

BioregionLibrary Count
Upper New19
Upper Catawba31
Watauga6
South Fork Holston16
North Fork Holston4
Middle New12
Upper James7
Upper Roanoke28
Upper Dan16
Upper Yadkin24
TOTAL163

Sign up today to get involved!

Facilitator

We’re always looking for people to volunteer as discussion facilitators.  If you’re a discussion facilitator, basically it’s your job to make sure the discussion runs smoothly, following our guidelines.

We’re putting the finishing touches on a Facilitator Guidebook, so anyone who decides to volunteer will have plenty of support to ensure the job is done well.

A map showing all counties that overlap with the northern half of the Upper New and our neighbor bioregions.

Sign up today to get involved!

Notetaker

Every Friday discussion needs at least one notetaker, and preferably two.  If more than two notetakers show up for a Friday discussion, that would be most excellent.  The more, the merrier.

What notetakers do is use notebooks to take handwritten notes about what is happening and what is said within the discussion, and by whom.  These notes are then compiled and shared back to the community for inclusion in the Friday shared drive.

Notetakers are the people who build the analog bridge between the “digital detox” of the Friday discussions with the online community of the Friday listserv and shared drive.

A map showing all counties that overlap with the southern half of the Upper New and our neighbor bioregions.

Listserv Moderator

As the online Friday community grows, we know we’re going to need listserv moderators.

With the Friday listserv, this will mostly entail helping to manage new member sign-ups and invitations, as well as moderating the messages of new members.  All new members’ posts to the listserv are moderated by default during initial membership in the community.

Sign up today to get involved!

Discussion Host

Perhaps the most influential involvement possible for anyone in the Friday community is to volunteer as a discussion host, setting up another satellite Friday somewhere in the biosphere.

Consider putting in a diagram showing the minimum number of volunteers needed to start a Satellite Friday.

  • Host: can be one person or multiple or organization
  • Facilitator: can be same as host(s) or additional people
  • Notetaker: need at least one for each Friday discussion
  • Participants: really, one person other than the facilitator and notetaker is all it takes, but ideally at least three people would be an acceptable minimum for a discussion event

As we are with the facilitators, we’re putting the finishing touches on a Discussion Host Guidebook, so anyone who decides to volunteer will have plenty of support to ensure the job is done well.

Sign up today to get involved!

Fridays Across the Biosphere

Imagine, finding a local Friday group wherever you happen to be traveling, being able to walk in and have a discussion that is synchronized with the global topical schedule.

Map of the continental United States showing library branch locations as potential hosts for Friday discucssion sessions.
Map showing libraries of the continental United States.

According to data from OpenStreetMap, there are approximately 17500 library branches in the continental United States.  If five people held a Friday discussion at each branch, that means 87,500 people would be participating in the same topic of discussion at once!

What about all of North America?

Map showing libraries of North America

And South America and Africa?

Map showing libraries of South America and Africa

And Europe and Asia?

Map showing libraries of Europe and Asia.

And Oceania?

Map showing libraries of Oceania

Imagine Friday discussions across the globe.

According to data from OpenStreetMap, there are more than 97,000 library branches in the biosphere.  If five people held a Friday discussion at each branch, that means 485,000 people would be participating in the same topic of discussion over the course of an international day!  That’s almost half a million people.

Now let’s get started.

Sign up today to get involved!

Categories
Learning Experiences News

Free Spring Workshops!

Free Spring Workshops!

We’ve got two workshops coming up at The Upper New, hosted at our headquarters in Sparta, North Carolina:

Monday, March 23: Watersheds as Bioregions

Tuesday, March 24: Good Citizen Science (iNaturalist)

The workshops will take place at 115 Atwood Street, Sparta, NC, in the same building complex that houses the Alleghany County Public Library and the Alleghany Campus of Wilkes Community College.  (This building is also known as the BDC.)

Categories
Bioregionalism News Volunteering

Seeking Volunteer Bioregional Correspondents!

The Upper New is seeking volunteer bioregional correspondents across the biosphere to contribute to a library of bioregional resources for ecological learning.  Essentially, we want folks to serve as groundtruthers reporting evidence of bioregional activities, wherever their chosen bioregion may be within the biosphere.  We currently have a couple volunteers in place, including one focusing on permaculture as she engages in various bioregions in South America.

Categories
Bioregionalism News

The Local Watersheds Project

Introducing The Local Watersheds Project

What is the Local Watersheds Project?

At face value, Local Watersheds (LW) is a web-based system where any person on the planet can geolocate themselves within their current watershed boundary, wherever they may be at the time. They can then access curated information about the watershed.

Cropped disc logo for the Local Watersheds Project

At its core, LW is a tool for understanding bioregions and bioregionalism: bioregional learning, planning, building.

Quick tip: If you’re in a big hurry, feel free to go ahead and support the Local Watersheds project through our Givebutter campaign.

Watersheds as Bioregions

In Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World, David Orr introduces us to the concept of bioregional catalogs:

“The rejuvenation of local economies will also require the development of different forms of technology…They share common traits of being smaller in scale, generally based on renewable energy, relatively less expensive, widely dispersed, locally owned and controlled, and environmentally benign. The discussion of alternative technology, pro and con, has tended to focus too much on tools and too little on materials and bioregionally appropriate designs and procedures that reduce the need for expensive and destructive technologies. Pliny Fiske in Austin, Texas has developed a catalog of bioregionally available and cost-competitive building materials, such as caliche and mesquite.  Similar inventories need to be done elsewhere as an alternative to importing expensive environmentally damaging materials. We need similar catalogs of bioregionally appropriate methods of forestry, land management, and agriculture that minimize the need for energy and high technology.” (p. 74-75)

Orr, D. W. (1991). Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. (n.p.): State University of New York Press.

As such, LW is an interactive global atlas accessing nested networks of watersheds as bioregions, identifying inventories of local, renewable, sustainable materials and services as bioregional catalogs in service of local communities and economies within limits.  LW is a tool for local communities to build, curate, and update bioregional catalogs for their watersheds, and to share these catalogs with the world, in service of bioregional learning, planning, building, and stewardship.

Potential Uses of the Local Watersheds Application

Beyond simply cataloging inventories of watersheds, we foresee a variety of potential uses for LW, including teaching and learning, research, presentation, and planning.

  • Use LW as an exploratory learning tool, perusing maps, etc.  
  • Use LW to conduct ecosocial research about one or more watersheds/bioregions
  • Use LW to collect evidence for a public or private argument, presentation, or discussion (such as a town hall meeting)
  • Use LW as a tool for bioregional planning to build a bioregional community.

Let’s take a brief look at how LW could be used for bioregional learning, planning, and building.  (These elements of usage for LW are derived heavily from the work of Robert Thayer, which he presents in his book LifePlace.)

Bioregional Learning

Elements of bioregional learning include mapping, spatial analysis, and regional geography, regional geology and climate, bioregional flora and fauna, hydrology and watershed analysis, water resource management, landscape ecology and restoration. To be more specific, consider mapping and restoration.

Mapping and Geography

Mapping, spatial analysis, and regional geography: People would use LW to “study the local bioregion from a hierarchical physiographic perspective, learning mapping skills, studying geographic principles, and gradually focusing closer and closer on the home place.” (Thayer, R. L., 2003)

Ecology, Stewardship, and Restoration

Landscape ecology and restoration: People would use LW to “study the dynamic spatial patterns and distributions of species within the bioregion, learning to identify, protect, and restore the critical habitats, corridors, and networks upon which the ecological integrity of the region depends.” (Thayer, R. L., 2003)

Bioregional Planning

Thayer gives a brief introduction to bioregional planning (as compared to traditional planning practices) in LifePlace:

“the trends in such processes are toward increased respect for the limits and potentials of the region; reduction in the scale of physical intervention; a finer-grained, more regional self-sufficiency; ever-broadening grassroots constituency and public support; more incorporation of local wisdom from long-term residents and those intending to stay; intersection of sustainability goals and regionally distinct characteristics; and adaptation to different scales and different situations with similar, but not necessarily identical, outcomes or results.” (p. 173)

Thayer, R. L. (2003). LifePlace: Bioregional Thought and Practice. Ukraine: University of California Press.

Within this context, let’s consider four types of planning activities where people might find LW to be a useful set of tools: mapping, monitoring, indexing, and footprinting.

Mapping

One technique is to seek and record all mappable information about the bioregion. In this fashion, maps become social research and action tools whose value is at least as great as that of the single-resource data layers (e.g. soils, hydrology, vegetation, slope) typical of top-down ecological planning.

Monitoring

Monitoring of ecosystem conditions is another important bioregional planning tool: monitoring of water quality and quantity, wildlife and fish populations, recreational or transit use, climate conditions, and the like.

Indexing

Indexing involves focusing on a physical parameter such as water, energy, or food; thus an analyst can determine how much is produced within a given region versus how much is consumed.  Resulting ratios can be used to gauge relative self-sufficiency versus dependency on external supplies.  Periodic measurement of these benchmarks allows relative progress toward or away from desired sustainable conditions to be determined.

Footprinting

Ecological footprinting is where someone calculates the land-equivalent areas needed for sustainable production of life needs, such as water, energy, food, or wood.  This is a process conceptualized by William Rees and Mathis Wackernagel, among others.

Mockup of the Local Watersheds interface.
Visual mockup of the Local Watersheds interactive map interface, showing the Upper New River bioregion with a single HUC-10 (watershed) selected and highlighted in the associated attribute table. Base map is the Esri World Topographic Map licensed under the Esri Master License Agreement.

Bioregional Building

Beyond planning, there is bioregional building, which entails executing the elements within a bioregional plan, in a sense.  

There are three major areas of bioregional building:

  1. Biodiversity Framework
  2. Agricultural Heart
  3. Regenerative Communities and Infrastructure

Below are some examples of building activities that could take place in each of these three areas, using LW as a toolset while conducting these activities.

Biodiversity Framework

Living corridors 

Protect what remains of natural river, stream, and slough corridors and enhance their capacity to provide habitat for biodiversity, species mobility, water quality, erosion control, flood control, and amenity values for both private landowners and the public. 

Whole watersheds 

Plan for and manage whole watersheds from headwaters to confluence or outflow.

Conservation areas 

Define joint public-private natural areas and manage them as quilts of conservation.

Agricultural Heart

Farmland preservation 

Identify and preserve in perpetuity the best farmlands in the valley and mitigate the loss of agricultural land by preserving a great deal more of it than is developed.

“Foodshed”

Consider the bioregion as a “foodshed” and support local consumption of locally produced foods.

Expanded farming role 

Find ways to pay farmers for the ecological cultural and stewardship services they provide.  This is where the “food not lawns” idea may also fit in.

Regenerative Communities and Infrastructure

Compact cities and towns 

Grow cities and towns inward and upward, not outward.  Locate “new” development on “old” sites.

New village centers 

Redesign aging shopping centers as dense vertically integrated mixed land use centers containing commercial shops, offices, recreation, civic amenities, residential buildings.

Regenerative transit 

Provide multimodal bus-bicycle-rail transit using fees extracted from the real costs of automobile sprawl.

Local Energy

Generate energy as locally as possible, at appropriate scales.  Avoid transmission loss at all costs.

An Open Educational Focus

Our intention for Local Watersheds for all the platform tools to serve as an open educational resource that will be registered as an OER Hub through OER Commons.

Hopefully, you’re already beginning to think about how you could use a toolset like Local Watersheds to conduct your own bioregional learning, planning, and building!

What’s the Real Purpose of Local Watersheds?

We’re creating LW to provide people with a global local toolset for bioregional planning, teaching, and learning, made available as open educational resources (OER).  The motivation is to foster ecological literacy, systems wisdom, and ecocentric mindsets, as well as bioregional perspectives, stewardship, and engagement through the planning, teaching and learning uses of this toolset.

What does success for Local Watersheds look like?

Success for LW means that users around the biosphere are accessing and contributing high quality information elements to the database inventory with increasing frequency, and that teaching, learning, and building/planning activities using LW tools are happening with increasing frequency and regularity throughout the biosphere.  Success means that more bioregional communities are defined and cultivated across the biosphere.

Intended Impact of Local Watersheds

Who are the “targeted audiences” of Local Watersheds?

At full capacity, Local Watersheds should serve all humans in the biosphere, in service of all living beings.  

As a pilot, in the Upper New River basin/watershed/bioregion, there are approximately 350,000 humans.  This audience is our alpha target.

The nine neighboring basins (Middle New, Upper James, Upper Roanoke, Upper Dan, Upper Yadkin, Upper Catawba, Watauga, South Fork Holston, North Fork Holston) contain a much larger population of humans (including parts of the Charlotte Metropolitan area).  This audience is our beta target.  

The United States (340 million), Canada (41 million), and Mexico (131 million) will be included in our North American outreach campaign.  This is an audience of ~512 million humans.

One of the questions we were asked about Local Watersheds is: What is the estimated number of lives impacted by this project once it is fully deployed?

As we mentioned above: a successful North American outreach campaign includes an audience of ~512M humans, and a ten percent return on this campaign means impacting the lives of 5 million humans.  As this is a global project in service of all humans in the biosphere, if we are to define “fully deployed” for the LW project, this would mean that all humans have access to the LW platform (regardless of frequency of use).  

So, when fully deployed, we would hope for Local Watersheds to impact billions of human lives.

We’re not stopping with humans.  The idea is to impact the lives of all species with which we humans share the biosphere, as a result of increased ecological literacy, ecocentric mindsets, and bioregional stewardship achieved by humans in service of our biospherical community members.

 A foundational purpose of Local Watersheds, and of bioregionalism in general, is to take on ecocentric mindsets to move beyond anthropomorphism, anthropocentrism, which is also called human exceptionalism or human supremacism.  

Local Watersheds should help us all understand that we share the biosphere with all living beings, and LW can help us to take the steps necessary to reorient our existences to share this space from the perspective of interspecific ecological justice.

Who will be the primary users of Local Watersheds?

Primary users of LW would include contributors, groundtruthers, administrators, learners, teachers, researchers, planners, presenters, and journalists. 

Primary use cases would include teaching, learning, research projects, bioregional planning, evidence-based arguments, articles, white papers, demos, presentations, and public discussions.

Happening Next: Develop For Good

Here’s the really good news about Local Watersheds: we’re already getting serious traction!  The Upper New has been accepted to join Develop for Good’s upcoming Winter 2026 project batch.

Our cohort runs from October 27, 2025 to February 21, 2026.  Develop for Good has assembled a volunteer team of undergraduate students to work on a web application design for Local Watersheds.

In their communications with us, Develop for Good informed us that the student team’s work “may include user research, information architecture, visual design mockups, interactive prototypes, and recommendations for implementation platforms. The deliverable will be design documentation that your technical contractors can use to guide actual development.”

Develop for Good also emphasized their excitement about us taking an innovative approach to ecological education, and look forward to working with you!

More about Develop For Good

Develop For Good is a recent phenomenon, hatched during the COVID pandemic, when universities sent millions of students home, and internship and employment opportunities essentially vanished overnight:

“Spurred by the critical needs of both students looking for work and nonprofits seeking digital support, Computer Science students at Stanford created Develop for Good. We support diverse college students as they build software for nonprofits under industry mentorship. Our mission is to ensure every college student has the opportunity to gain real-world, high-impact tech experience, all while creating meaningful solutions for the nonprofit sector.” 

Develop For Good: https://www.developforgood.org/about-us

Here Develop For Good explains a bit more about their “cohort” approach to design work.

“We offer 16-week batches of custom, made-to-order services, which can include a combination of our sprint types depending on the scope of your needs and what a project team can achieve in this timeframe. Each project team consists of the following members: 1 student Product Manager, 1 student Design or Technical Manager, 4-6 Designers and/or Engineers, up to 1 Team Mentor based on availability, and additional 1:1 Mentors based on availability. Together, the members of a team will dedicate ~800 hours of technical work…”

Develop For Good: https://www.developforgood.org/for-nonprofits

Develop for Good provides example case studies of previous work, and here we take the opportunity to highlight two previous projects we find quite impressive: Readeezy and Falling Fruit.  Readeezy worked with Develop For Good to begin bringing a digital library for struggling readers to smartphones, and the Falling Fruit project focused on using ML (machine learning) to provide time-series predictions for plant ripeness.

A map of the Upper New River basin bioregion, showing boundaries of each HUC-10 watershed within. Base map is derived from OpenStreetMap. OpenStreetMap is open data, licensed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) by the OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF)

Support Local Watersheds!

If you think this Local Watersheds project is a great idea, there is already a great way for you to help The Upper New get the project up and running: you can support the project through our Givebutter Campaign.

We’re raising $5000 to extend the design and development “runway” for The Local Watersheds Project.

This includes supporting our in-house efforts to develop an “alpha” prototype database and application that can be tested locally in the Upper New River basin (05050001) and our nine neighboring basins, such as the Upper Yadkin (03040101) and Watauga (06010103) basins.

Please consider supporting our work today.  Thank you!

Categories
News The Upper New Review Volunteering

Special Research Project: Myanmar

We are seeking volunteers from around the globe for a special research project opportunity focused on Myanmar.

If you’re ready to apply for this research project (as a volunteer or intern), please use our Jotform application.

For more information, please continue reading.

Categories
Interactive Basin Project News The Pulse Of The Species

TPOTS Demo 2024 October

We’ve assembled our first trail camera trap demo video for the interactive basin project: TPOTS Demo 2024 October.

TPOTS Demo 2024 October

What’s the story behind these videos? Read on below and find out.

Categories
Essays Nonfiction The Upper New Review

Inheritances

Eleanor Whitney

In 1969 my Dad purchased 13 acres for a borrowed $11,000 on Arrowsic. A seemingly remote Maine island, it had been inhabited by the Abenaki Indians before the English settled there in the 1600s and was the site of several bloody confrontations between the native communities and the British. There, a diminutive, white clapboard lighthouse stood a lonely watch over a dangerously rocky section of the Kennebec river as it churned relentlessly towards the Atlantic. Granite crags jutted into the river, where twisted, windswept pines clung to shallow soil. Cattails whispered in the gray green marshes while osprey circled above.

The island felt isolated in time and place, despite being just across the river from a busy naval shipyard in Bath. It was connected to the mainland by a series of 1950s green steel bridges that spanned “upper hell gate,” a branch of the river full of dangerous rocks that had been widened by the army corps of engineers in the late 1880s. It was this geography that had given the island its original name, Arrowseag, meaning “place of obstruction” by the Abenaki.

My father, a forester, had been hired by the owner of a large swath of land on the island to subdivide and sell it. When my father first visited the island he stood in a field on top of a small rise with brush that reached above his waist, looking down across sumac and pasture pines to the Kennebec river. Two bald eagles soared overhead. “Well, if this isn’t a spot,” he thought.

The lot he bought included the overgrown field and a forest full of stately pasture pines that overlooked a salt marsh that turned golden in the fall. The woods were bisected by stone walls marking old property boundaries and one could still draw water from a well in the field with an old metal hand pump.

In 1979 my parents built a single room cabin they considered their wedding present to each other. “Well, I paid for it,” my Dad remarked, “But it was ours.”

“Maybe it was his to me,” my mother conceded.

The cabin had been designed on a napkin by an architect who had bought the neighboring lot. It had a huge picture window looking out onto the salt marsh, but no insulation, heat, or running water. The center of the cabin featured a wood burning stove, which heated the place up to sweaty hot on winter nights, which were sometimes so cold that frost would collect on the nails inside. The property also featured an outhouse, designed and built by another neighbor, which cost $500. “It was expensive for its time,” my mom explained, “But it was a nice outhouse!”

For me, the cabin was a place of rural childhood dreams, and of refuge and escape for my parents. There I could run wild through the woods pretending to be astride a unicorn pegasus, build sprawling tree forts in the pasture pines, and painstakingly construct imaginary homes: a stick lean-to for my Eeyore stuffed animal — forever my spiritual sibling with his sad-eyes and sighing cynicism — and “fairy houses,” ephemeral constructions of leaves, blades of grass, and woodland flowers. My parents and I took canoe trips, raked leaf piles, went skiing and snowshoeing, and took hikes through a mossy, mysterious woods to the small lighthouse. This was the kind of Maine idyll my parents must have pictured when they moved to the state for good from Boston in the late 1970s.

I can still remember every detail of the cabin: the tarnished silverware we kept in a wicker basket under the counter, the crocheted, rainbow wool blanket on the mattress in the loft where my friends and I slept, and the fold out, yellow canvas captains chairs that sat around the blonde wood trestle table that had been custom built for the space.

When I was a teenager we moved from a suburban village to a more rural one and used the cabin less and less. I left home for the west coast and then, later, for college in New York City where I settled in Sunset Park, Brooklyn in 2002 and never left.

In many ways, moving to New York was an escape for me, much like the cabin had been for my parents. The city was a respite from Maine and from my family which both still felt too constricting, conservative, and set in their ways. I craved New York’s expansive possibility, the way it beckoned me to wander forever, and the possibility to grow into who I wanted to be, separate from my parents’ expectations. This must have been similar to the way that moving to Maine felt to them in the 1970s.

Part of me imagined adulthood meant shaking off my parents and all the contradictions and complications of our relationship. Yet even as it was expansively diverse and far from Maine culturally and politically, the reality of the city felt stifling — increasingly expensive rents, exhausting commutes, jobs that never paid enough or satisfied the ambition that drove me to New York in the first place. Still, in 2009, towards the end of the recession, I faced the reality that my life, career, and friends were all in the city and I adabonded my plans to “someday” leave New York City for Paris or the West Coast or somewhere I had yet to imagine. My parents stepped in with a proposal: they were selling the cabin and the proceeds from those 13 acres could help me buy a one-bedroom apartment in Sunset Park. I encountered the building one morning, biking to work. It was on top of the highest point in Brooklyn, across the street from the park, a six-story pre-war building from the 1930s with a banner out front boasting newly renovated condos.

I looked at the fifth-floor apartment on a Sunday afternoon, and even though it was half-finished, the original, 1931 parquet floors beckoned, shining in the golden hour light and I knew it was the place.

I could picture where I would place my desk to write, how the open kitchen and living/dining room would host parties and houseguests, how I could sink into the bathtub and rest my head on the cool marble bathroom walls, how I could fill the west-facing bedroom with plants. My parents drove down the next weekend to look at it with me and afterwards we sat at a picnic table in Sunset Park and wrote up the offer letter. My mother insisted that we add a closet to the bedroom, an addition I would always call “mom’s closet.” My parents jokingly called the apartment “camp Brooklyn,” and I marveled at how 13 acres of Maine woods and fields could suddenly be reduced to 840 square feet in South Brooklyn. On the day I moved in my parents loaded up our 1996 Chevrolet pick up truck and drove the seven hours to New York, navigating the BQE and all its potholes with the back of the truck filled with furniture, among them the trestle table and captains chairs from the cabin and a mid-century teak desk and lounge chair my Dad had bought in the mid-70s after the end of his first marriage. Over the next ten years I packed friends elbow to elbow around the table for dinner parties and brunches, covered it with pamphlets and fliers for neighborhood political gatherings, and argued about how best to care for the wood with an adamant and alcoholic ex that I later threw out of the house. For Christmas in 2009 I made my parents a photo album of the apartment, including the blazing sunsets that lit up the western sky that I would climb out on the fire escape to observe, suspended five stories above Seventh Avenue on a web of girded steel.

At 4:49 pm on April 3, 2019 my phone rang. I was three weeks into a new job, working in a sun filled, historic office building in Soho at a startup. Before I picked up to hear my friend’s voice on the other end, I knew. It was a crystal clear spring day with gusty winds and my building was on fire.

As I jogged up the hill, through Sunset Park, I saw a crowd of people gathered, eyes to the sky, gawking at the six-story, brick edifice, the anchor on the corner of 44th street and 7th avenue since 1931, smoke billowing out of the windows and across the scrubbed spring sky. I listened to walls of sirens as the entire roof and sixth floor of our building that had felt so solid turned to ash and was carried away on the April wind. I filled the immediate aftermath with administrative tasks: canceling utilities, filing insurance claims, forwarding my mail, registering with the red cross, finding a rental apartment, going to therapy. I floated numbly through the city, pulling together the shreds of my life into something that looked like an existence that was mine.

I sank into the cold, dark waters of grief, a place my parents, for all their love, care, and concern, could not reach. I was cold and snappish as they offered consolation, asked questions, and suggested tasks I had settled weeks before. I lashed back, listing instead every responsibility on my shoulders, every question unanswered by building management, the fire department, my neighbors. Every phone call, text, and email I received sent my heart pounding, as I braced myself for the next bout of bad news.

The fire opened up a new emotional landscape. My parents insisted on driving down from Maine to see me. I met them in Sunset Park. I saw them before they saw me, looking frail and fragile, two thin figures leaning against the April wind that blew sharply off the harbor, silhouetted in their deep green Barbour jackets clashing with the park’s garish spring grass, the Manhattan skyline rising behind them. Through their vulnerability I saw my own. The tables had turned. My life had been bisected by before and after, and as I waded through grief, rage, and confusion, I also had to rely on myself for care, organization, and administration my parents could no longer provide and that I no longer wanted from them. I felt guilty, almost, that they had to go through this, wishing I could protect them from their own feelings about my loss. I had entered another unknown territory of adulthood. I finally was able to enter my apartment after weeks of asbestos abatement, structural support installation, and constant downpours on our now roofless building. I walked up five flights of stairs in a hazmat suit and N95 mask, the walls dank and dripping. Water pooled in the middle of the living room. The trestle table, where I had sat with my parents eating sausage and eggs and watching the sunrise over the salt marsh as a child and had served as the heart of my home as an adult, had been sawed into pieces by a contractor, reduced to mere kindling. The teak desk was buried under detritus, and plant pots were smashed and scattered throughout. The clothes in “mom’s closet” were soaked and covered in plaster, a hole punched in the bedroom wall from a burned beam.

The last time I was in the apartment, a shell of its former self, sooty and damp, the books ground to a mushy pulp on the buckling floor, the golden hour light still poured in, illuminating the whole space. If I squinted hard enough I could almost convince myself that nothing had changed.

“You’ll see that afternoon light again,” a friend had assured me, but I knew that I wouldn’t.

“It’s just stuff,” people told me and I told myself. But objects contain stories and are physical manifestations of our memories. There’s a reason we visit museums and use objects to tell the stories of our culture and our history.

I began to obsess over the objects that I could save from my apartment, as if by salvaging them from the smokey murk I could salvage my life. After the fire, these objects became a stand-in for nurturing family connections I had backed away from. Among the objects I rescued: My Mom’s leather LL Bean tote bag that her father bought for her in the 70s as she embarked on her career. Beans had originally sent a larger size bag to her by accident and he kept insisting she keep it because the bigger one was more expensive than the one she had paid for. “He always wanted something for cheaper,” she sighed. He was a banker.

My Dad’s 1956 Langlitz Leathers jacket, made of horsehide due to continued post-war materials rationing. He wore it on his motorcycle trip around the country in 1957. I only learned of the jacket’s existence when he informed me he planned to auction it on eBay, because it could fetch up to $3,000 from a collector. “Do you know what an heirloom is?” I wailed, beseeching my father not to sell it. Instead he gifted it to me. Wearing it is like donning an exoskeleton. It pushes my shoulders back and forces me to stand up straight. There’s no way to zip it up over my boobs. It’s not a worn in, relaxed leather, but one that was made for protection from road rash and whipping winds. It was the first thing I went looking for, reaching blindly into the dark, mildewing morass that had been my closet to pull it out, intact.

My Dad’s mid century teak desk with a drawer and wide desk top, perfect for arranging piles of books and papers for projects. As a teenager it sat upstairs in a hallway in our cape house from the 1700s and I sat at it to make my zines, covering the desk top with scratch and glue stains. My friends Bill and Lee carefully extracted the large desk from what was left of the “office” in my apartment, moving burned and broken furniture out of the way and carrying it unsteadily down five flights of sooty stairs. The desktop was covered in ghostly stains where my laptop and library books sat on the day of the fire. I spent nearly a week sanding the desk with increasingly fine grains of sandpaper and dabbing it with teak oil until gleamed golden, smelling of solvent and rebirth. My laptop sits in the same spectral square as my old one as I sit here to write this.

The mid century lounge chair and matching ottoman with bent walnut wood designed by Alvar Aalto, a design which inspired millions of Ikea knock-offs. A purchase after my Dad’s divorce in the 70s. He got it from a Danish modern furniture store downstairs from his office in our small, suburban town. The chairs had occupied various rooms throughout my childhood home, but I never thought about them. They were ubiquitous and so seemed without value. After the fire I couldn’t imagine my future living rooms without them — no Ikea knock off would suffice. I found a modern furniture restoration company in a warehouse on Sunset Park’s waterfront, teetering on the edge of New York harbor, as if it was about to slump in. I ordered an entire cow hide and a half for new cushions in an office stuffed with hundreds of upholstery sample books, sunlight filtering through dusty blinds, open just enough to reveal the Statue of Liberty in the distance. Heiti, who ruled the workshop with a sharp tongue, quickly explained how they would find the exact canvas for the chair backs, how they would restore the water damaged, splitting walnut frame. After the restoration, the leather on the cushions was impossibly buttery, the bent walnut legs gleamed. I sent a photo to my father. “They look better than when I bought them,” he wrote back.

The provenance of these objects was clear, the inheritance they offered me concrete, and reckoning with them was straightforward: salvage, assess, research, restore, and integrate into my new life. The provenance of other inheritances I reckoned with after the fire was murkier. The rubble of entitlement that the fire exposed was something else entirely to sort through. The fire disrupted a carefully planned financial future for me and legacy for my parents, a chain of support that stretched back generations that enabled me to assume a certain safety and comfort as I moved throughout my life. Whiteness and property have long been legally intertwined in the US. Legal scholar Cheryl Harris writes in the Harvard Law Review that its core characteristic is “the legal legitimation of expectations of power and control that enshrine the status quo as a neutral baseline, while masking the maintenance of white privilege and domination.” The fire disrupted the status quo and gave me a chance to look into the face of the supposedly “neutral baseline” of expectations I made about my life that this kind of often obscures to those who hold it.

While I continued to wait for a resolution of the building’s sale and multiple lawsuits to work their way through, I was able to leverage what assets and credit I did still have, to another 840 square feet — this time a 1958 homestead cabin on 2.5 acres in the Southern California desert. I had gravitated towards another place my parents were not connected to. Where my parents had found their grounding and escape in pasture pines and a saffron-colored salt marsh filled with the pull of the tides, the unseen ocean whispering just beyond, I was called by the arid expanse of the Mojave desert. The desert is the inverse of coastal Maine’s cold, evergreen lushness, but parts of it were once an inland sea. When I look out past my sandy backyard I see creosote covered hills, mesas, and mountains rolling like the Atlantic to a vast horizon, punctuated by boulders and Joshua Trees, spindly messengers from another world.

The house is situated on land once inhabited by the Serrano Indians, in front of a mesa studded with sandstone boulders and dark lava flows they called “Ate ‘ivyat” or “Rocky Place.” Many of the Serrano were forcibly removed or weakened by disease throughout the 1800s, and the area was opened up for homesteading after California became a state in 1850. After ranchers and miners had worked over the land, decimating the delicate balance of local ecology, the Small Tracts Act in 1938 allowed homesteads in the high desert to be parceled out on “useless” land in smaller, 5 acre lots. Veterans and middle class families looking to escape the growing population and pollution of Los Angeles for the healthy air and recreation possibilities of the desert flocked to the area, constructing dwellings haphazardly throughout the region. I marvel that my house is the same size as my apartment and I try to picture how the two would fit together, how the layouts compare, superimposing my old life on my new, or my new life on my old.

Before I had ever been to the desert and felt its pull, my parents visited Joshua Tree National Park and warned me to be careful there, knowing I was curious about it, much like they had warned me about New York City. In the desert, they warned me, trails disappear into sand and cross themselves, all the rocks and trees look the same, the heat will suck your life and bleach your bones. The Marines at the nearby base engage in war games, thudding supersonic explosions adding a foreboding quality to the landscape that felt utterly alien to an east coaster. When I moved to the desert my Dad sent me a compass. It hangs on a hook by my front door unused.

I once thought that I could shed my ambivalence about my family and frustration at their unexamined privilege by moving away, pushing myself into other environments that felt more in line with who I wanted and saw myself to be. The tension between the support I was raised with, how I resent it, the unspoken contract it came with, and a sticky web of complicity and growth is what actual adulthood looks like, not a clean break with my home and family like I naively hoped for as a teenager. I see more clearly the emotional, legal, structural, historical, and financial ties bind me to my family and my homes, and with it a tender, imperfect clarity.

But I still had to contend with the objects. Faced with a storage unit full of sooty furniture in Brooklyn and an empty house in California, I decided to crate and ship my rescued furniture west. On a June evening in Brooklyn I loaded the teak desk still covered with ash, faded from water stains, along with the plastic wrapped and pristinely restored lounge chair and ottoman into a waiting cargo van. I waved to them as the driver sped off towards the BQE. “See you on the other side” I mumbled, a quiet prayer for safe passage. I imagined them in their crate, protected as if they were museum pieces, as they lumbered across the country. It felt like a miracle when they arrived on my washboarded dirt road, intact and wrapped in plastic, ready to start their life again.

About the Author

Eleanor Whitney

Eleanor C. Whitney is a writer, musician, and community builder based in California’s high desert and Brooklyn, NY. She is the author of Riot Woman, a celebratory but critical look at the Riot Grrrl movement, and Promote Your Book, a guide to book marketing, published by Microcosm Publishing. She holds an MFA in creative nonfiction from CUNY Queens College. She currently serves as the Promotions Editor at MAYDAY magazine.

Her website is eleanorcwhitney.com/